![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/gta6lo-600x438.png\")
Two weeks ago, someone calling themselves \u2018Cyberleek\u2019 started posting gameplay footage from Grand Theft Auto VI, months ahead of the game\u2019s November launch.<\/p>\nTwo weeks ago, someone calling themselves \u2018Cyberleek\u2019 started posting gameplay footage from Grand Theft Auto VI, months ahead of the game\u2019s November launch.<\/p>\n
Take-Two Interactive immediately responded with a wave of takedown notices and a cluster of DMCA subpoenas at a federal court, aiming to hunt down whoever was behind the leak.<\/p>\n
DMCA subpoenas are a special legal tool that allows rightsholders to request information from third parties, without first having to sue someone. In this case, the game company used it for a broad sweep, targeting thousands of Discord users.<\/p>\n
TorrentFreak previously covered<\/a> how that net also widened to Microsoft, X, and Google\u2019s YouTube. And in new filings, it appears that the investigation is moving forward. <\/p>\n On Friday, a day after Rockstar streamed its extended look at the game on Netflix, Take-Two went back to court. The company requested another subpoena targeted at Discord, but this time it asked to keep the details out of public view. <\/p>\n Take-Two\u2019s initial DMCA subpoena request was public. This allowed news outlets<\/a> to dig through the entire demand and identify the three servers it named, including one tied to content creator DarkViperAU<\/a>.<\/p>\n That request is still live today. According to Take-Two\u2019s latest statements, it was issued on August 21 and \u201cpromptly served on Discord,\u201d although the court\u2019s records don\u2019t list the clerk\u2019s issuance, as would typically be the case.<\/p>\n Notably, Discord\u2019s Ryan Rigney stated on X<\/a> on August 24 that the company had \u201cnot yet been served with a subpoena from Take Two,\u201d adding that Discord intended to \u201cevaluate the validity and scope before responding.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Whether that evaluation played any role in the second subpoena\u2019s more targeted request is unknown, but the sequence is worth highlighting.<\/p>\n The second subpoena Take-Two requested at the New York federal court is different. Instead of publicly listing the Discord targets, the game company requests the court to file it under seal. This means that the targets are completely blacked out.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n What we do know is that this second request is more narrowly targeted, focused on one additional Discord user and a previously identified user.<\/p>\n \u201cTake-Two has identified one additional Discord user and obtained additional identifying information for a previously identified Discord user, as well as additional information concerning the community servers identified in its prior subpoena for which it now seeks more targeted information,\u201d the request reads.<\/p>\n According to Take-Two, the secrecy is warranted because filing the request in the open would benefit the alleged infringers.<\/p>\n The motion to seal argues that the subpoena attachment \u201creveals highly sensitive, confidential information about an ongoing investigation into copyright infringement and the misappropriation of Take-Two\u2019s confidential information.\u201d <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u201cPublic disclosure of this information could compromise Take-Two\u2019s ongoing investigation and even tip off the alleged infringers as to the nature and progress of Take-Two\u2019s investigation and information Take-Two has gathered about the infringement,\u201d Take-Two writes. <\/p>\n Take-Two fears that the infringers (it uses plural here) could then destroy or conceal important evidence. <\/p>\n The company stresses that its investigation \u201cis rapidly evolving and ongoing,\u201d which is also why the second subpoena seeks \u201cdifferent information\u201d than the first.<\/p>\n For now, the new demands are hidden from view. The court has yet to rule on whether they will stay that way and the subpoena has not been issued yet.<\/p>\n The same \u201crapidly evolving\u201d framing was also mentioned in a follow-up to Take-Two\u2019s YouTube subpoena, with the opposite result.<\/p>\n Take-Two had previously asked Google to identify the people behind three YouTube personas tied to a leaked video: CyberLeeks, Surfer24k, and CyberLeek_ar_io.<\/p>\n Judge John P. Cronan declined to sign off on the request without further information on how the targets are linked to the video. Take-Two did provide some additional details, but ultimately dropped the request, citing the evolving investigation and stating that it no longer needs the YouTube data.<\/p>\n \u201cTake-Two has determined it no longer needs the particular information requested. Thus, Take-Two respectfully withdraws its subpoena request,\u201d it informs the court. <\/p>\n Take-Two reserves the right to return to Google with a new request later. For now, however, the YouTube subpoena is off the table, while the Discord demands become the focal point. Whether those will lead Take-Two to the infringers has yet to be seen.<\/p>\n \u2014<\/em><\/p>\n A copy of Take-Two\u2019s second Discord subpoena request and its motion to seal can be found here<\/a> (pdf) and here<\/a> (pdf). Take-Two\u2019s withdrawal of the Google subpoena is available here<\/a> (pdf). Judge Cronan\u2019s memo endorsement is available here<\/a> (pdf).<\/p>\n From: TF<\/a>, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.<\/p>\nA Sealed Second Discord Subpoena<\/h2>\n
![\"rigney\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/rigney.png\")
<\/center><\/p>\n![\"sealed\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/sealed.png\")
<\/center><\/p>\n\u201cRapidly Evolving\u201d Investigation<\/h2>\n
![\"compromise\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/compromise.png\")
<\/center><\/p>\nYouTube Subpoena Dropped<\/h2>\n