![\"stop](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/stop-danger.jpg\")
Over the past few months, Belgium has issued several site-blocking orders targeting hundreds of piracy-linked domain names. <\/p>\nOver the past few months, Belgium has issued several site-blocking orders targeting hundreds of piracy-linked domain names. <\/p>\n
These blockades follow a newly instated two-step process. A local court first issues a blocking order, after which a special government body determines how it will be implemented. This process aims to prevent errors and overblocking.<\/p>\n
While site blocking is common in Europe, these new Belgian blockades go beyond the typical ISP blockade. Similar to France<\/a> and Italy <\/a>, the orders were also directed at third-party public DNS resolvers. <\/p>\n The first implementation order, issued by the Belgian Department for Combating Online Infringement in April<\/a>, required both ISPs and DNS resolvers to restrict access to pirate sites. Specifically, Cloudflare, Google, and Cisco\u2019s OpenDNS were ordered to stop resolving over 100 pirate sites or face fines of \u20ac100,000 euros per day.<\/p>\n This order prompted significant pushback, most notably from Cisco, which ceased operating its OpenDNS service in Belgium<\/a> soon after the order was announced.<\/p>\n In July, another order by the Belgian authority ordered blockades of shadow library websites, including Libgen, Zlibrary, and Anna\u2019s Archive. This sweeping court order<\/a> required ISPs to take action and also involved other intermediaries, such as hosting providers, search engines, and DNS services.<\/p>\n The underlying court order also called for a broad blockade<\/a> of the Internet Archive\u2019s Open Library service. While that was ultimately prevented<\/a>, the involvement of a broad range of intermediaries caused concern about the escalating scope of the blocking orders. <\/p>\n On November 26, the Belgian Department for Combating Online Infringement published a new blocking implementation order. While this effectively adds dozens of new domains to the Belgian blocklist, the scope of this order is surprisingly limited. <\/p>\n Instead of casting a wide net, the order strictly targets Belgium\u2019s five major Internet Service Providers: Proximus, Telenet, Orange Belgium, DIGI Communications Belgium, and Mobile Vikings.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The list of \u201caddressees\u201d no longer includes the DNS resolvers, Google, Cloudflare, and Cisco, which were central targets in the April blocking order. There is no mention of hosting services, advertisers, or other intermediaries either. <\/p>\n The official implementation order does not mention the rightsholder(s) who requested the blocking measures, nor does it mention the targeted sites. However, the blocked domains are published in a separate spreadsheet showing that 1337x, Fmovies, Soap2Day, and Sflix branded domains are among the key targets.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Since these pirate targets often switch domain names to evade enforcement, rightsholders can submit a new list of mirror sites or proxies once per week, capped at 50 new domains per week. When these are approved by the Belgian Department, ISPs have five working days to update the blocklist.<\/p>\n The decision to exclude DNS resolvers from this latest order is likely not a coincidence. It might very well be a direct consequence of the legal pushback Cisco initiated earlier this year, when it appealed the April blocking order at the Brussels Business Court. <\/p>\n This appeal was not without result, as the court suspended enforcement of that blocking order against Cisco in July, after which OpenDNS became available again in Belgium.<\/p>\n \u201cThe OpenDNS service has been reactivated in Belgium following a decision by the Brussels court to suspend enforcement of the order requiring Cisco to implement DNS blocking measures. The suspension of the order is pending a final ruling in the legal proceedings which remain ongoing,\u201d a Cisco representative wrote in a community update<\/a>.<\/p>\n To find out more about the suspended blocking measures, we reached out to the Belgian Department for Combating Online Infringement, which did not respond to our inquiry. Without further details, we don\u2019t know whether the suspension also applies to other DNS resolvers. Confusingly, the official transparency portal makes no mention of an appeal at all. <\/p>\n It is likely, however, that since the legality of the blocking orders against third-party DNS resolvers is still being litigated, rightsholders have chosen to limit their blocking requests to ISPs. This would suggest that it\u2019s a pause, not a formal retreat. <\/p>\n \u2014<\/em><\/p>\n A copy of the latest blocking implementation order, published by the Department for Combating Infringements of Copyright and Related Rights Committed Online and the Illegal Exploitation of Online Games of Chance<\/em> on the 26th of November, 2025, is available here (pdf)<\/a>. From: TF<\/a>, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.<\/p>\nNew \u2018Limited\u2019 Piracy Blocking Order<\/h2>\n
![\"orderbel\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/orderbel.png\")
<\/center><\/p>\n![\"block\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/blockbel.png\")
<\/center><\/p>\nRetreat or a Pause?<\/h2>\n
\n
\nThe full blocking spreadsheet, last updated November 26, is available at the Belgian government website<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n