{"id":83952,"date":"2025-07-06T09:00:30","date_gmt":"2025-07-06T09:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=83952"},"modified":"2025-07-06T09:00:30","modified_gmt":"2025-07-06T09:00:30","slug":"googles-dmca-transparency-report-freezes-after-recent-volume-surge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=83952","title":{"rendered":"Google\u2019s DMCA Transparency Report \u2018Freezes\u2019 After Recent Volume Surge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/dmca-google-s1.png\" alt=\"dmca-google-s1\" width=\"290\" height=\"205\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-242459\">In May 2012, Google Search expanded its <a href=\"https:\/\/transparencyreport.google.com\/copyright\/overview\">transparency report<\/a> with a new section solely dedicated to DMCA takedown requests.<\/p>\n<p>For the first time, outsiders were able to see details of the URLs copyright holders were targeting and in what quantity.<\/p>\n<p>The decision to make this information available for public scrutiny was partly triggered by a rapid increase in removal requests. This was having an impact on the \u201cfree flow of information\u201d, according to the search engine.<\/p>\n<h2>10 Billion Takedowns and Beyond!<\/h2>\n<p>While additional transparency helped to uncover serious errors and various abuses over the years, it didn\u2019t curb the volume. On the contrary, legitimate DMCA takedown requests against search results shot up and thenn continued to grow.<\/p>\n<p>The chart below shows the increase in takedowns over the years, with a notable uptick over the past year and a half. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><center><em>DMCA targeted URLs (2012-2025)<\/em><\/center><br \/><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/googledmcachart.jpg\" alt=\"dmca takedowns google\" width=\"600\" height=\"369\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-269395\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/googledmcachart.jpg 1111w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/googledmcachart-300x185.jpg 300w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/googledmcachart-600x369.jpg 600w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/googledmcachart-150x92.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\"><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Around November of last year, Google received its 10 billionth takedown request. Less than a year later, in April, this number had already increased by another 2.3 billion, or roughly 100 million takedowns per week. After that, Google\u2019s transparency reporting updates froze.<\/p>\n<h2>Transparency Report \u2018Freeze\u2019<\/h2>\n<p>For several months now, Google\u2019s transparency report has been stuck at 12.3 billion reported URLs. No new information has been added since mid-April, which is a clear outlier as previous updates were typically released multiple times a week.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><center><em>Stalled April 2025 data<\/em><\/center><br \/><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/april2025.jpg\" alt=\"april 2025\" width=\"600\" height=\"283\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-269396\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/april2025.jpg 1713w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/april2025-300x142.jpg 300w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/april2025-600x283.jpg 600w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/april2025-150x71.jpg 150w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/april2025-1536x725.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\"><\/center><\/p>\n<p>The most recent updates in the official transparency portal are dated April 13, and the official takedown charts for senders and URLs also stop on that date.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.googleapis.com\/transparencyreport\/\">raw takedown statistics<\/a> and details, which Google offers in bulk for academic research and related purposes, are no longer being updated either. The 9.6 gigabyte compressed archive was last updated on April 14. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><center><em>Raw data not updated<\/em><\/center><br \/><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/googleremovals.jpg\" alt=\"raw\" width=\"500\" height=\"133\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-269398\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/googleremovals.jpg 716w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/googleremovals-300x80.jpg 300w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/googleremovals-600x159.jpg 600w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/googleremovals-150x40.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\"><\/center><\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s unlikely that Google would halt its transparency reporting efforts without good reason. Thus far, however, the company has not responded to a press inquiry we sent earlier this week, asking for more information. <\/p>\n<p>What is clear is that the company hasn\u2019t stopped its transparency efforts entirely. Google is still forwarding the DMCA notices it receives to the <a href=\"https:\/\/lumendatabase.org\/pages\/about\">Lumen database<\/a>, which has data as <a href=\"https:\/\/lumendatabase.org\/notices\/search?recipient_name_facet=Google+LLC&amp;sort_by=created_at+desc\">recent<\/a> as yesterday. <\/p>\n<h2>Information [REDACTED]<\/h2>\n<p>As a news publication that publishes multiple articles a year on Google\u2019s DMCA takedown effort, it would be good to see the full reporting functionality restored. <\/p>\n<p>At the same time, it would also be good to know why many of the publicly shared DMCA notices have redacted rightsholders or URLs. These can make it impossible to find out what content is actually being targeted, which negates the purpose of a transparency report. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><center><em>Redacted notices<\/em><\/center><br \/><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/redareda.jpg\" alt=\"redacted\" width=\"600\" height=\"482\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-269401\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/redareda.jpg 1475w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/redareda-300x241.jpg 300w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/redareda-600x482.jpg 600w, https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/images\/redareda-150x121.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\"><\/center><\/p>\n<p>In some cases the redactions also make little sense, such as the one below, where a takedown notice sent on behalf of Netflix redacted the domain of the original work as follows: <a href=\"https:\/\/lumendatabase.org\/notices\/53882797?access_token=jla8QAXnjiDHZ529ztWyhA\">n[redacted]x.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A representative from the Lumen database informed us that these redactions are not added at their end, so that suggests redactions are applied by Google. <\/p>\n<p>All in all, Google still offers much more transparency than most online service providers. There is a delay in reporting at the moment, as well as unexplained redactions, but we hope that regular reporting will resume as usual soon, so we can look out for new multi-billion takedown milestones.<\/p>\n<p>From: <a href=\"https:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/\">TF<\/a>, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpematico_credit\"><small>Powered by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wpematico.com\" target=\"_blank\">WPeMatico<\/a><\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In May 2012, Google Search expanded its transparency report with a new section solely dedicated to DMCA takedown requests. For the first time, outsiders were able to see details of the URLs copyright holders were targeting and in what quantity. The decision to make this information available for public scrutiny was partly triggered by a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":83953,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[308],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-83952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-torrent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83952","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=83952"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83952\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/83953"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=83952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=83952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=83952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}