{"id":82963,"date":"2025-05-07T09:00:29","date_gmt":"2025-05-07T09:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=82963"},"modified":"2025-05-07T09:00:29","modified_gmt":"2025-05-07T09:00:29","slug":"musi-faked-umg-email-to-stay-on-app-store-apple-claims-in-sanctions-motion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=82963","title":{"rendered":"Musi Faked UMG Email to Stay on App Store, Apple Claims in Sanctions Motion"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"musiLast September, Apple removed<\/a> popular music streaming app Musi from its App Store, affecting millions of users. <\/p>\n

Apple\u2019s action didn\u2019t come as a complete surprise. Music industry groups had been trying to take Musi down for months, branding it a \u2018parasitic\u2019 app<\/a> that skirts the rules.<\/p>\n

Delisting from the App Store put the future of Musi directly at risk. The company initially hoped to resolve the matter with Apple behind closed doors, but since the tech giant was unwilling to reverse its decision, Musi took the matter to court.<\/p>\n

\u201cBackchannel Scheme\u201d<\/h2>\n

Musi claimed that the App Store removal was the result of \u201cbackroom conversations\u201d between Apple and key music industry players. The app developer alleged this was an \u201cunfair\u201d and \u201ctainted\u201d removal process designed to put it out of business.<\/p>\n

Musi hoped for a quick reinstatement and requested a preliminary injunction to put the app back in the App Store while the lawsuit was pending. That attempt failed, however. <\/p>\n

In January, a California federal court denied the preliminary injunction, ruling that Apple did not act unreasonably or in bad faith when it removed the app following complaints from music industry players and YouTube. <\/p>\n

The order meant that the case would continue without Musi being available in the App Store. And a new filing submitted by Apple, shows that the company has absolutely no intention to change its mind. <\/p>\n

Apple Returns Fire<\/h2>\n

In a motion for sanctions filed yesterday at the California court, Apple requests sanctions against Musi for false or misleading allegations, which include the remarks concerning the \u201cbackchannel scheme\u201d.<\/p>\n

According to Apple, discovery in this case clearly revealed that there were no backroom deals but Musi nonetheless included these claims in its amended complaint. <\/p>\n

\u201c[D]iscovery thoroughly disproved Musi\u2019s baseless conspiracy theory that Apple schemed to eliminate the Musi app from the App Store to benefit \u2018friends\u2019 in the music industry,\u201d Apple notes. <\/p>\n

\u201cTo make matters worse, Musi attempted to give its falsehoods a veneer of truth by provisionally redacting many allegations and misrepresenting to the Court that those allegations reflected information Apple produced in discovery.\u201d<\/p>\n

These alleged misrepresentations are sanctionable, Apple argues. The tech giant reiterates that it received numerous complaints about Musi from various parties and dismisses the notion of a backchannel scheme.<\/p>\n

Apple: \u2018Musi Impersonated UMG\u2019<\/h2>\n

Adding to the purported misrepresentations in the complaint, Apple adds further color by alleging that Musi previously impersonated UMG executive Jason Miller, to get reinstated in the App Store. <\/p>\n

\u201cApple previously removed Musi\u2019s app from the App Store and Musi only regained access in 2020 by fraudulently impersonating a complainant,\u201d Apple writes. <\/p>\n

Exhibits shared by Apple show that Musi informed Apple that a complaint from UMG was resolved, citing communications with jasonmiller@umusic.solar-secure.com. Musi founder Aaron Wojnowski forwarded this email chain to Apple, which seemingly confirmed this. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Forwarded email<\/em><\/center>
\"umg\"<\/center><\/p>\n

Follow-up communications between Apple and Universal Music painted a different picture. UMG informed Apple that the email was \u201cfraudulent,\u201d that Jason Miller had no record of sending it, and the email address used was not a UMG address.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt appears that the app developer created a false email to misrepresent compliance on behalf of Universal. Therefore, the claim should not be closed and the app should be removed immediately,\u201d UMG explained at the time.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\u2018Fraudulent\u2019<\/em><\/center>
\"fraudulent\"<\/center><\/p>\n

Making matters worse, in July 2020 UMG informed Apple of another instance where the same fraudulent \u2018Jason Miller\u2019 email address was allegedly used to file a false copyright claim against a different app, Yokee.<\/p>\n

Despite the alleged impersonation, Musi remained available in the App Store until last year. However, according to Apple, the alleged impersonation is further evidence of a pattern of dishonesty, which warrants sanctions. <\/p>\n

It is now up to the court to review the evidence and decide whether it proves that Musi did indeed cross the line and if sanctions are warranted. Meanwhile, Apple\u2019s motion to dismiss the entire case also remains pending. <\/p>\n

\u2014-<\/em><\/p>\n

A copy of Apple\u2019s memorandum supporting its motion for sanctions, filed at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is available here (pdf)<\/a><\/p>\n

From: TF<\/a>, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.<\/p>\n

Powered by WPeMatico<\/a><\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last September, Apple removed popular music streaming app Musi from its App Store, affecting millions of users. Apple\u2019s action didn\u2019t come as a complete surprise. Music industry groups had been trying to take Musi down for months, branding it a \u2018parasitic\u2019 app that skirts the rules. Delisting from the App Store put the future of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":82964,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[308],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-82963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-torrent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=82963"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82963\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/82964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=82963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=82963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=82963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}