![\"liga1\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/liga1.jpg\")
In dozens of countries around the world, website blocking is the preferred way for copyright holders to restrict access to pirate sites.<\/p>\nIn dozens of countries around the world, website blocking is the preferred way for copyright holders to restrict access to pirate sites.<\/p>\n
Originally pioneered in Europe, the enforcement tactic has since gone global, with blockades now in place from Asia to South America, with the United States queuing up<\/a> too.<\/p>\n In Peru, site blocking measures have been commonplace<\/a> for a few years already. In response to complaints from rightsholders, Internet providers have been ordered to block hundreds of domain names. The targets range from torrent sites, through YouTube rippers, to streaming portals. <\/p>\n These blocking orders are handed down by INDECOPI<\/a>, the IP protection arm of the government. Last November, INDECOPI collaborated in the latest round of Operation 404<\/a>, blocking or suspending 328 pirate sites and services. Meanwhile, regular blocking efforts continue as well. <\/p>\n Late last week, INDECOPI issued two new site blocking orders, all targeting sports streaming sites. The blocking orders follow a complaint from the sports company 1190 Peru<\/a>, which manages and commercializes the rights of several sports leagues, including Peru\u2019s top football competition Liga1.<\/p>\n After considering the presented evidence, INDECOPI ordered local internet providers including Telefonica, Am\u00e9rica M\u00f3vil, and Entel, to block 23 pirate sites. Those targeted include Rojadirecta, Channelstream.es, Pirlotv, Librefutboltv, and Socceronline.me, among others.<\/p>\n These blocking measures are not new, but the scope of the injunction is. For the first time, INDECOPI handed down a dynamic injunction, meaning that additional domains can be blocked, if site operators switch to new ones to circumvent blocking measures,<\/p>\n \u201c[T]he administrators and\/or owners of the website subject to blocking could take actions in order to circumvent the aforementioned measures, which would become ineffective. Such measures could involve, among others, the creation of new domain names..,\u201d INDECOPI writes.<\/p>\n \u201cFor this reason, the Commission considers it necessary that this precautionary blocking measure adopts a dynamic nature,\u201d the order adds. <\/p>\n The order references dynamic blocking orders in other countries, including in the European Union, and concludes that a similar approach is also warranted in Peru. If rightsholders want additional domains to be blocked, they first have to back up their request with evidence, however, to ensure proper oversight.<\/p>\n The latest injunctions show that rightsholders can\u2019t simply list any pirate site in their blocking requests. INDECOPI carefully considers all presented evidence, and doesn\u2019t shy away from rejecting blockades when it falls short. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n For example, 1190 Peru\u2019s original complaint regarding Rojadirecta listed four domain names; rojadirectatv.nl, rojadirectatvhd.com, rojadirectatvhd.ws and rojadirectaenvivo.me. However, three of these domain names were rejected because the presented evidence was not sufficient.<\/p>\n Similarly, of the 47 alleged pirate site domain names in the second complaint, only 22 were ultimately blocked. The others were rejected over lacking evidence, incomplete records, or the absence of any infringing content. <\/p>\n One domain that stands out is sur.ly, which is an outbound link management service. Sur.ly<\/a> has nothing to do with pirate sites, but third-parties can use the domain to load external websites, much like a proxy. Needless to say, blocking Sur.ly would be rather extreme, and INDECOPI denied the request.<\/p>\n \u201cThe site corresponds to a web traffic tool and, by itself, does not carry out acts of exploitation of the contents that are the subject of the claim,\u201d the IP protection authority writes. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n TorrentFreak spoke to someone familiar with the matter, who informed us that some of the rejected blocking requests were resubmitted to INDECOPI with proper, notarized evidence. Whether that will include Sur.ly\u2019s main domain, which has plenty of legal uses, is unknown. <\/p>\n \u2014<\/em><\/p>\n Copies of the two injunctions are available below, with an overview of all domain names that must be blocked by local ISPs.<\/p>\n Injunction 1 (RESOLUTION N\u00b0 376-2024<\/a>)<\/p>\n \u2013 channelstream.es Injunction 2 (RESOLUTION N\u00b0 375-2024<\/a>)<\/p>\n \u2013 rojadirectatvhd.ws <\/p>\n From: TF<\/a>, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.<\/p>\nPeru\u2019s Blocking Efforts<\/h2>\n
\u2018Dynamic\u2019 Pirate Site Blocking Order<\/h2>\n
Scrutinized Evidence<\/h2>\n
![\"futbollibre\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/futbollibre.jpg\")
<\/center><\/p>\n![\"surly\"](\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/surly.jpg\")
<\/center><\/p>\n
\n\u2013 fbstreams.pm
\n\u2013 futbolparatodostv.net
\n\u2013 intergolestv.com
\n\u2013 lacasadeltikitaka.net
\n\u2013 librefutboltv.com
\n\u2013 librefutboltv.net
\n\u2013 liga1maxtv.pe
\n\u2013 liga1maxtvhd.com
\n\u2013 liga1maxtv.live
\n\u2013 nbatv.site
\n\u2013 pirlotv.app
\n\u2013 pirlo.run
\n\u2013 sinfutboltv.com
\n\u2013 socceronline.me
\n\u2013 telerium.biz
\n\u2013 peru15.com
\n\u2013 vipleague.im
\n\u2013 viper-play.net
\n\u2013 -viperplayhd.com
\n\u2013 viprow.nu
\n\u2013 zonadeporteshd.online<\/p>\n