{"id":73246,"date":"2023-05-11T09:01:18","date_gmt":"2023-05-11T09:01:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=73246"},"modified":"2023-05-11T09:01:18","modified_gmt":"2023-05-11T09:01:18","slug":"twitch-streaming-destiny-2-teen-cheater-fails-in-bid-to-shake-bungie-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=73246","title":{"rendered":"Twitch-Streaming Destiny 2 Teen Cheater Fails in Bid to Shake Bungie Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Destiny<\/a>After filing a series of lawsuits against cheat developers, cheat sellers, resellers, and even gamers who use cheats, there\u2019s little doubt that Bungie views cheating as a threat to its business.<\/p>\n

After a Washington court awarded Bungie $6.7 million in damages<\/a> against LaviCheats on Monday, the company scooped a damages award of $16.2m<\/a> in the same court (but in a different case) on Tuesday.<\/p>\n

For the sole defendant in yet another Bungie lawsuit, filed at exactly the same court in 2022, these headlines should make for uncomfortable reading. While the case doesn\u2019t feature a cheat developer or seller, Bungie has shown few signs that it\u2019s prepared to back down from its mission to stamp out game tampering.<\/p>\n

Twitch Streamer Feels The Heat<\/h2>\n

In its July 2022 complaint<\/a>, Bungie targeted a Twitch user who reportedly live streamed himself cheating in Destiny 2 while evading multiple bans. When it became apparent that the user was just 17-years-old, his name was removed from the docket and replaced by the initials L.L. Bungie continued, business as usual.<\/p>\n

According to the complaint, L.L. and Bungie have a history. While using various pieces of cheat software, L.L. streamed his games on Twitch and using its own tools, Bungie detected his activity and banned him. L.L. responded by opening new accounts, which Bungie would eventually shut down. When L.L. posted a series of tweets in May 2022, in which \u2018arson\u2019 and \u2018death\u2019 were mentioned along with a named member of staff, Bungie was prompted into action.<\/p>\n

In common with other lawsuits against cheaters, Bungie says that L.L.\u2019s use of cheat software modified Destiny 2 and led to the creation of an unauthorized derivative work. That entitles the company to either $150,000 in statutory damages or an amount to be determined at trial. Bungie says that each time L.L. played the game, he also bypassed Bungie\u2019s security measures. Citing violations of the DMCA\u2019s anti-circumvention provisions, Bungie demands $2,500 for each time that happened. <\/p>\n

More fundamentally, each time L.L. was banned and then signed up for a new account, he agreed to Bungie\u2019s Limited Software License Agreement with no intent to comply with it; fraud according to Bungie. That\u2019s on top of allegations that L.L. resold Bungie-issued digital emblems on a third-party platform with authorization to do so.<\/p>\n

L.L. Came Out Swinging<\/h2>\n

Covered in detail<\/a> last September, L.L.\u2019s response to Bungie\u2019s complaint can be summarized in a few key points.<\/p>\n

Anything that L.L. may have said about Bungie was simply the teenager making fun of the company\u2019s \u201capparently ineffective\u201d efforts to combat cheating in Destiny 2. Since \u201cCongress has not, at present, chosen to make [cheating] unlawful,\u201d the defense continued, none of the alleged acts in the complaint violated any of Bungie\u2019s rights.<\/p>\n

Regarding violations of the LSLA, the court was informed that as a minor, L.L. has the right to disaffirm any contract within a reasonable time of becoming an adult. As it happened, he had already declared all contracts with Bungie null and void. <\/p>\n

In its response<\/a> to L.L.\u2019s motion to dismiss, Bungie said the court could go right ahead and dismiss all of its claims related to the LSLA. While the LSLA prohibits things like cheating, it also acts as permission since it licenses certain actions, including playing the game. <\/p>\n

With no license in place, Bungie said that every download and every play of Destiny 2 amounted to copyright infringement, potentially placing L.L. in a less advantageous position than he had enjoyed before.<\/p>\n

In a subsequent filing, which appeared to reference the claim that Congress still hadn\u2019t made cheating in games illegal, Bungie informed the court of the Yout vs. RIAA decision<\/a>, which relates to the circumvention of technological measures that protect access to a copyright work.<\/p>\n

Cheating may not be illegal but without circumvention, this type of cheating wouldn\u2019t exist.<\/p>\n

Court Steps in to Clarify the Law<\/h2>\n

In an order handed down this week, District Judge Richard A. Jones said that since L.L. had properly disaffirmed all contracts due to his status as a minor, he would now address L.L.\u2019s motion to dismiss Bungie\u2019s lawsuit for failure to state a claim.<\/p>\n

With no enforceable contract between L.L. and Bungie, the Court dismissed Bungie\u2019s breach of contract claim in connection with the LSLA. Bungie\u2019s claim of fraudulent inducement, related to L.L.\u2019s allegedly false statements when agreeing to the terms of the LSLA, is a matter to be addressed at a later stage, so was not dismissed.<\/p>\n

Copyright Infringement<\/h2>\n

Bungie\u2019s arguments in support of its copyright infringement claim were described by the Judge as \u201cpersuasive.\u201d The cheat software \u201ctransformed Destiny 2 by manipulating the software to add visual elements overlayed on the original visuals in the game\u201d and since L.L. had no permission from Bungie, that amounts to an unauthorized derivative work.<\/p>\n

Attempts by the defense, to play down the anti-cheat provision in the LSLA, also failed. Any use of software to cheat in Destiny 2 was preannounced in the LSLA as grounds for immediate termination of L.L.\u2019s license. <\/p>\n

Anti-Circumvention Claim<\/h2>\n

Regarding Bungie\u2019s anti-circumvention claims, the Court said that L.L. bypassed license access control measures when he agreed to the LSLA but with no intention to abide by it. He also bypassed Bungie\u2019s \u201cstep control measures\u201d when he created new accounts after being banned, and when he used cheat software to avoid detection by Bungie\u2019s anti-cheat technology.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Court is not persuaded by Defendant\u2019s cherry-picked reading of the DMCA that only establishes a violation when the Defendant decrypts, descrambles, or disables Plaintiff\u2019s software,\u201d Judge Richard A. Jones\u2019 order continues.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen read as a whole, the statute clearly states that avoiding or bypassing a technological measure violates the DMCA. Therefore, the Court denies Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss the circumvention of technological matters claim.\u201d<\/p>\n

L.L. enjoyed some success with the defeat of Bungie\u2019s claim under the Washington Consumer Protection Act, which related to L.L.\u2019s unauthorized sales of digital emblems. The Court accepted that L.L.\u2019s cheating, selling, and other conduct caused injury to Bungie\u2019s business, but the company failed to show that L.L.\u2019s conduct is of public interest.<\/p>\n

With the case set to continue, the Court invited Bungie to submit its first amended complaint.<\/p>\n

Judge Richard A. Jones\u2019 order can be found here<\/a> (pdf)<\/em><\/p>\n

From: TF<\/a>, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.<\/p>\n

Powered by WPeMatico<\/a><\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After filing a series of lawsuits against cheat developers, cheat sellers, resellers, and even gamers who use cheats, there\u2019s little doubt that Bungie views cheating as a threat to its business. After a Washington court awarded Bungie $6.7 million in damages against LaviCheats on Monday, the company scooped a damages award of $16.2m in the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":73247,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[308],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-torrent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=73246"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73246\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/73247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=73246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=73246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=73246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}