{"id":68719,"date":"2022-11-17T09:02:04","date_gmt":"2022-11-17T09:02:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=68719"},"modified":"2022-11-17T09:02:04","modified_gmt":"2022-11-17T09:02:04","slug":"6522-sleeping-bitcoins-worth-107-million-wake-up-after-5-years-of-inactivity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=68719","title":{"rendered":"6,522 \u2018Sleeping Bitcoins\u2019 Worth $107 Million Wake Up After 5 Years of Inactivity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img width=\"768\" height=\"432\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep-768x432.jpg\" class=\"attachment-medium_large size-medium_large wp-post-image\" alt=\"6,522 'Sleeping Bitcoins' Worth $107 Million Wake up After 5 Years of Inactivity\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep-190x107.jpg 190w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep-380x214.jpg 380w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep-760x428.jpg 760w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/sleep.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\"><\/p>\n<p><strong>On Nov. 16, 2022, at Bitcoin block height 763,474, someone transferred 6,522 bitcoin worth roughly $107 million after the coins sat idle for more than five years. While bitcoin\u2019s value is 75% lower than it was a year ago, so-called sleeping bitcoins have been waking up amid the recent crypto market capitulation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>While Bitcoin\u2019s Price Remains 75% Lower Than a Year Ago, a Slew of Old Bitcoins Start Moving After Years of Inactivity<\/h2>\n<p>Five days ago, 3,500 bitcoin from 2011 were <a href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/3500-sleeping-bitcoins-from-2011-worth-over-60-million-wake-up-after-11-years-of-slumber\/\">transferred<\/a> for the first time in 11 Years. Amid the crypto market carnage associated with FTX, old coins have been waking up for some reason, and they have been moving to unknown wallets. For instance, the bitcoin address \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/address\/1QBG9wu7nosaMqRPuMRZz9YDEtCpTQKfHk\">1QBG9<\/a>,\u201d moved 25 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> at block height 762,719 from an address <a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/transaction\/2e1400626bf6076177ed221ca3f75eb3289a80d8952d54c122206e3114e96aed\">created<\/a> on Nov. 13, 2011.<\/p>\n<p>Not too long after that, 50 bitcoin from 2010 were spent on Nov. 14, 2022, after sitting idle for over a decade. The bitcoin address \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/address\/1LB8BHdaRjeRsxz8SqiAFFQLjXkzCKsgvX\">1LB8B<\/a>,\u201d which moved the 50 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> at block height 763,149 was <a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/transaction\/574554b6b4fc39cfad851a10202690e7a3adf79b286ecc162520c7c6aa35dcc7\">created<\/a> on May 23, 2010. All three of those sightings were bitcoins stored in addresses that remained idle for more than a decade.<\/p>\n<h2>6,522 Bitcoin Worth Over $107 Million Move After More Than 5 Years of Slumber<\/h2>\n<p>Two days after the 50 bitcoin from 2010 moved, <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> that derived from an address created on July 31, 2017, moved after sitting idle for more than five years. While that\u2019s not super old, <a href=\"https:\/\/btcparser.com\/?a=1LVBnipcnkwqHKaXcHeV9gcbPMvByaJkqk\">blockchain parsers<\/a> from btcparser.com caught the individual or entity spend approximately 6,522.40 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The stash is worth more than $107 million using today\u2019s <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> exchange rates. The bitcoin address \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/address\/1LVBnipcnkwqHKaXcHeV9gcbPMvByaJkqk\">1LVBn<\/a>\u201d is also connected to close to 10,000 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> first accrued in an <a href=\"https:\/\/oxt.me\/address\/1GD8Qh7ebmvdaB8Ampcq8qZqNPr78nzjSP\">address<\/a> created on May 29, 2011. When the \u201c1LVBn\u201d bitcoin address was created on July 31, 2017, bitcoin was trading for $2,875 per unit according to statmuse.com <a href=\"https:\/\/www.statmuse.com\/money\/ask\/bitcoin+price+2017\">metrics<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>That means the cache of 6,522 bitcoins was only worth roughly $18.7 million before it went to sleep for more than five years. If the stash of 6,522 bitcoins were sold today, the owner would have profited by more than 472%.<\/p>\n<p>If it was the same owner that acquired approximately 9,478.77 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> on May 29, 2011, the individual could have acquired the bitcoins at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.statmuse.com\/money\/ask\/bitcoin+price+2011\">$8.30 per unit<\/a>. At that price in the spring of 2011, the person could have gained roughly 1,189% in profit against the U.S. dollar over 11 years.<\/p>\n<h2>Owner Sends Cache of Bitcoins With Zero Privacy Techniques to 2 Addresses<\/h2>\n<p>The funds, however, don\u2019t look as though they were sent to an exchange, according to onchain data, as the 6,522 bitcoins now reside in two different addresses. The change address \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/address\/1AkJq3KKGpKQDVRzVYR6SxdzToM47nopdV\">1AkJq<\/a>\u201d holds 6,061.83 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a>, and 460.57 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> went to the address \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/address\/bc1qtfs87lzdcw3k2vzks9cx32pv0khh4a3zzr74sq\">bc1qt<\/a>.\u201d The net send of 6,522 bitcoins remains idle at the time of writing.<\/p>\n<p>Throughout the history of the 6,522 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> spent on Nov. 16, 2022, the transactions have never been sent in a private fashion. Blockchair.com\u2019s privacy tool gives <a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/privacy-o-meter\/13860360394252de8b0ae4f7c16be163cd08743751304f793191a82152134a91\">the last change transaction<\/a>, which moved 6,061.83 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a>, a privacy rating of \u201c0\u201d or \u201ccritical.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-559213 aligncenter\" title=\"6,522 'Sleeping Bitcoins' Worth $107 Million Wake Up After 5 Years of Inactivity\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/pop.jpg\" alt=\"6,522 'Sleeping Bitcoins' Worth $107 Million Wake Up After 5 Years of Inactivity\" width=\"1280\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/pop-300x94.jpg 300w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/pop-1024x320.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/pop-768x240.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/pop.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/p>\n<p>Every time the owner of these bitcoins moved coins, matched inputs and outputs were discovered making it easily identifiable by blockchain analysis. It\u2019s worth noting that the technical term \u201cspent\u201d and the use of the word \u201cchange\u201d in this article do not necessarily mean the bitcoins were sold.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-559214 aligncenter\" title=\"6,522 'Sleeping Bitcoins' Worth $107 Million Wake Up After 5 Years of Inactivity\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/matchsedd.jpg\" alt=\"6,522 'Sleeping Bitcoins' Worth $107 Million Wake Up After 5 Years of Inactivity\" width=\"1280\" height=\"575\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/matchsedd-300x135.jpg 300w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/matchsedd-1024x460.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/matchsedd-768x345.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/matchsedd.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/p>\n<p>In fact, they simply could be transferred to alternative addresses by the same owner. It\u2019s also worth noting that the bitcoins that originated from the wallet on May 29, 2011, which are also associated with the 6,522 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BTC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BTC<\/a> spent on Nov. 16, 2022, may have seen ownership change hands either on or off the blockchain.<\/p>\n<p>The owner of the bitcoin address did not spend the <a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin-cash\/address\/1LVBnipcnkwqHKaXcHeV9gcbPMvByaJkqk\">corresponding<\/a> bitcoin cash (<a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BCH\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BCH<\/a>) associated with the \u201c1LVBn\u201d bitcoin address. 6,522.40 <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BCH\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BCH<\/a> remains in the address at the time of writing and the <a class=\"lar-automated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/markets.bitcoin.com\/crypto\/BCH\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BCH<\/a> is worth roughly 680,939 nominal U.S. dollars.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>What do you think about the 6,522 bitcoin that woke up after five years and three months? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"wpematico_credit\"><small>Powered by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wpematico.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">WPeMatico<\/a><\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Nov. 16, 2022, at Bitcoin block height 763,474, someone transferred 6,522 bitcoin worth roughly $107 million after the coins sat idle for more than five years. While bitcoin\u2019s value is 75% lower than it was a year ago, so-called sleeping bitcoins have been waking up amid the recent crypto market capitulation. While Bitcoin\u2019s Price [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":68720,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[309],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cryptocurrency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=68719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68719\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/68720"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=68719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=68719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=68719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}