{"id":54870,"date":"2021-02-24T09:02:04","date_gmt":"2021-02-24T09:02:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=54870"},"modified":"2021-02-24T09:02:04","modified_gmt":"2021-02-24T09:02:04","slug":"youtube-identifies-operator-of-shell-company-behind-class-action-piracy-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=54870","title":{"rendered":"YouTube Identifies Operator of \u201cShell Company\u201d Behind Class Action Piracy Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Sad<\/a>Last summer, Grammy award-winning musician Maria Schneider and entity calling itself \u2018Pirate Monitor\u2019 filed a class action lawsuit<\/a> against YouTube.<\/p>\n

They accused YouTube of failing in its copyright responsibilities by denying smaller artists from accessing its takedown tools (Content ID), failing to terminate repeat infringers, and profiting from piracy. YouTube was not impressed.<\/p>\n

In an early fightback, YouTube said that Pirate Monitor and\/or its agents had opened bogus YouTube accounts to upload its own videos<\/a> and then filed takedown notices against the same content claiming that its rights had been infringed. This, YouTube said, was a ploy to gain access to its Content ID system after Pirate Monitor had been previously denied.<\/p>\n

Case Management Statement Piled Pressure on Pirate Monitor<\/h2>\n

Early January there were signs that the claims against YouTube were starting to unravel. YouTube said that there was no legal basis to allow Pirate Monitor to access Content ID and Schneider already has access to Content ID through her publishing agent, who had used it for years on her behalf. Furthermore, YouTube added that the original complaint failed to allege even a \u201csingle instance of infringement\u201d for Schneider\u2019s works and in any event, Schneider\u2019s publishing agent had already granted YouTube a license to use all of her musical works, effectively negating all copyright claims.<\/p>\n

With arguments over discovery continuing, YouTube has now amended its counterclaim. The additional details appear to undermine the case against Pirate Monitor further still, with allegations that the company and its operator are behind an elaborate and unlawful scheme to manipulate YouTube to support a lawsuit.<\/p>\n

Amended Counterclaim \u2013 More Meat On The Bones<\/h2>\n

Right off the bat, YouTube identifies the person it believes is behind Pirate Monitor Ltd\/Pirate Monitor LLC \u2013 Hungarian film director and California resident G\u00e1bor Csup\u00f3. <\/p>\n

While not mentioned in YouTube\u2019s filing, information online indicates that Csup\u00f3 is the founder of animation studio Klasky Csupo, which produced shows like Rugrats, Duckman, Stressed Eric, and Aaahh!!! Real Monsters. Klasky Csupo also animated The Simpsons cartoons that first appeared on The Tracey Ullman Show. The company continued its involvement in The Simpsons for its first two seasons. <\/p>\n

YouTube says that Pirate Monitor is refusing to cooperate with discovery but it has managed to determine that Pirate Monitor has no employees other than Csup\u00f3, who presides over an \u201cinadequately capitalized shell corporation\u201d that \u201cdisregards corporate formalities\u201d and was set up for the purposes of the action against YouTube.<\/p>\n

\u201cCsup\u00f3 created Pirate Monitor LTD after his personal liability for the acts alleged herein first arose, and his misuse of the corporate form is continuing. As a result, Csup\u00f3 is responsible, and personally liable for, not only his own actions, but the acts of Pirate Monitor LTD as well,\u201d YouTube writes.<\/p>\n

According to YouTube, Pirate Monitor, Csup\u00f3 and\/or their agents opened YouTube accounts using bogus account information to upload videos. YouTube says this was done to mask the fact that those who subsequently filed copyright complaints to have the same content taken down were acting in concert. YouTube identifies two dozen accounts (all with Gmail addresses including the phrase \u2018ransomnova\u2019) that were created via an IP address in Pakistan and used to upload videos listed in the original complaint.<\/p>\n

At the time, YouTube says it was unaware of the connection between Pirate Monitor, Csup\u00f3, and the \u2018Ransomnova\u2019 accounts, so when it received around 1,800 DMCA takedown notices from Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3, it took the necessary action to remove the allegedly-infringing videos. It appears they were effectively taking down their own content, ostensibly to gain access to YouTube\u2019s Content ID system.<\/p>\n

Pirate Monitor Not Responding to Discovery Requests<\/h2>\n

YouTube says that Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 are in possession of information that would reveal their \u201cunlawful scheme\u201d but to date has refused to provide anything in response to discovery requests.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile withholding from YouTube all relevant information they possess, Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 have never denied that they and\/or their agents were responsible for creating the Ransom Nova accounts. They have never denied that they and\/or their agents uploaded through those accounts the very same videos that they then promptly claimed in DMCA takedown notices were infringing,\u201d YouTube informs the court.<\/p>\n

But even without cooperation, YouTube says it already has \u201coverwhelming evidence\u201d that Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 operated the accounts, either directly or indirectly. YouTube says that the clips uploaded were mostly 31 seconds long and did not correspond to particular moments from the films they came from. <\/p>\n

Furthermore, they were given nondescript names, suggesting that the uploader didn\u2019t intend regular YouTube users to find them. Nevertheless, Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 did manage to find them, and sent takedown notices within a few days of the uploads, despite many of the videos failing to clock up even a single view on YouTube.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn other words, Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 knew that the videos for which they sent takedown notices were on the YouTube service without having to actually view them. That is because Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 were responsible for having uploaded those videos in the first place,\u201d YouTube notes.<\/p>\n

An Even More Significant Smoking Gun<\/h2>\n

YouTube alleges that when Pirate Monitor, Csup\u00f3 and\/or their agents uploaded supposedly infringing videos to YouTube, they attempted to conceal their identities by uploading from a Pakistani IP address. However, when taking that same content down, they had no reason to do so, sending DMCA takedown notices from a Hungarian IP address. <\/p>\n

then, on November 12, 2019, YouTube says that someone logged into one of the Ransom Nova accounts \u2013 not from the usual Pakistani IP address \u2013 but from the same Hungarian IP address used to send the takedown notices.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn other words, RansomNova7 was sharing a computer and\/or unique Internet connection with Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 in Hungary on the same day (and in fact, at almost the same time) that Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 were using that same computer and\/or Internet connection to send takedown notices to YouTube,\u201d the company alleges.<\/p>\n

This allegation is not new but YouTube now goes further by naming the individual behind the \u2018RansomNova\u2019 accounts. Based on email address information supplied to YouTube, the platform was able to identify Sarfraz Arshad Khan, a resident of Pakistan who advertises himself as a computer services freelancer with expertise in the promotion of content on YouTube. <\/p>\n

Khan\u2019s LinkedIn profile is posted under the name \u2018Ransom Nova\u2019 and YouTube believes he was hired by Pirate Monitor and Csup\u00f3 to upload the \u2018pirate\u2019 videos which were later taken down based on allegations that they infringed copyright.<\/p>\n

Prayer For Relief<\/h2>\n

Based on the above, YouTube demands damages against Pirate Monitor LTD, Pirate Monitor LLC, and G\u00e1bor Csup\u00f3 to compensate YouTube for the harm caused by their conduct. <\/p>\n

YouTube also requests damages against the same for acting fraudulently and requests an injunction to prevent any similar behavior moving forward.<\/p>\n

YouTube\u2019s amended counterclaim can be found here<\/a> (pdf)<\/em><\/p>\n

From: TF<\/a>, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.<\/p>\n

Powered by WPeMatico<\/a><\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last summer, Grammy award-winning musician Maria Schneider and entity calling itself \u2018Pirate Monitor\u2019 filed a class action lawsuit against YouTube. They accused YouTube of failing in its copyright responsibilities by denying smaller artists from accessing its takedown tools (Content ID), failing to terminate repeat infringers, and profiting from piracy. YouTube was not impressed. In an […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":54871,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[308],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-torrent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54870\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/54871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}