{"id":3880,"date":"2016-12-26T09:14:15","date_gmt":"2016-12-26T09:14:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=3880"},"modified":"2016-12-26T09:14:15","modified_gmt":"2016-12-26T09:14:15","slug":"get-ready-for-2017-these-legal-precedents-on-bitcoin-were-set-in-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/?p=3880","title":{"rendered":"Get Ready for 2017 \u2013 These Legal Precedents on Bitcoin Were Set in 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>2016 saw numerous important court decisions made which affect the Bitcoin industry as a whole. We consulted lawyers and researched the biggest court cases of the year, ranging from whether or not Bitcoin is money to the fate of Ross Ulbricht. Here&rsquo;s what we&rsquo;ve found.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em><strong><small>Also read:&nbsp;<\/small><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/china-recognize-bitcoin-peoples-rights\/\" target=\"_blank\">China&rsquo;s Proposed New Law Recognizes Bitcoin as &lsquo;People&rsquo;s Rights&rsquo;<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<h2>Is Bitcoin money?<\/h2>\n<p><span>An age-old Bitcoin question returned to the spotlight in 2016: is Bitcoin money? Indeed, contradictory rulings were levied in relation to whether or not bitcoin is money.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>New York<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/bitcoin-512-000000-300x300.png\" alt=\"bitcoin-512-000000\" width=\"187\" height=\"187\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/bitcoin-512-000000-300x300.png 300w, https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/bitcoin-512-000000-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/bitcoin-512-000000-421x420.png 421w, https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/bitcoin-512-000000.png 512w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 187px) 100vw, 187px\">A New York judge decided Bitcoin is money in a high profile case linked to hacking attacks against U.S. multinational financial institution, J.P. Morgan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan rejected Anthony Murgio&rsquo;s attempt to have two charges dismissed in relation to his operation of Coin.mx, in which the prosecution <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2016\/09\/20\/judge-rules-bitcoin-is-money\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span>argued<\/span><\/a><span> the service represented an unlicensed bitcoin exchange. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Murgio argued bitcoins did not count as &ldquo;funds&rdquo; under federal law in a Manhattan courtroom in September. His argument was denied by the court. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&ldquo;Bitcoins are funds within the plain meaning of that term,&rdquo; Nathan wrote. &ldquo;Bitcoins can be accepted as a payment for goods and services or bought directly from an exchange with a bank account. They, therefore, function as pecuniary resources and are used as a medium of exchange and a means of payment.&rdquo;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Florida<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span>A Miami judge, contrarily, dismissed money laundering charges in July. Website designer Michell Espinoza was charged for illegally transmitting $1,500 worth of bitcoins to undercover detectives. The undercover detectives reportedly told Mr. Espinoza that they wanted to buy stolen credit-card numbers.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Teresa Mary Pooler decided in the case that Bitcoin was not fiat currency nor &ldquo;tangible wealth&rdquo; and &ldquo;cannot be hidden under a mattress like cash and gold bars,&rdquo; reports the<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.miamiherald.com\/news\/local\/crime\/article91682102.html#storylink=cpy\" target=\"_blank\"><i><span>Miami-Herald<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span>.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span>She opined in an eight-page order: &ldquo;The court is not an expert in economics; however, it is very clear, even to someone with limited knowledge in the area, the Bitcoin has a long way to go before it the equivalent of money.&rdquo; <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>She wrote that Florida law is currently too vague to apply to Bitcoin. <\/span><span>&ldquo;This court is unwilling to punish a man for selling his property to another when his actions fall under a statute that is so vaguely written that even legal professionals have difficulty finding a singular meaning,&rdquo; the Miami judge stated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>North Carolina<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span>Moreover, North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coindesk.com\/north-carolina-governor-signs-bitcoin-bill-law\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span>signed<\/span><\/a><span> House Bill 289 on July 6, thus expanding the state&rsquo;s Money Transmitter Act to cover activities related to bitcoin and other blockchain tokens. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The law was introduced in 2015, and has received criticism despite being drafted with input from blockchain and digital industry insiders with local regulators. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>As lawyer Jason Seibert, who represented Trendon Shavers in the case listed below, explains: <\/span><span>&ldquo;I think the best way to describe Bitcoin is actually as a commodity that can be used as money &ndash; just like any other commodity.&rdquo;<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Bitcoin&rsquo;s First Felon Sentenced<\/h2>\n<p><span>In July, Bitcoin&rsquo;s so-called &ldquo;first felon&rdquo;&nbsp;was sentenced to 18 months. Trendon Shavers, known as pirateat40 in bitcoin forums early on in the cryptocurrency&rsquo;s existence, was<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/trendon-shavers-sentenced-in-first-bitcoin-securities-fraud-case-1469141141\" target=\"_blank\"><span>charged<\/span><\/a> <span>in a case tied to his Bitcoin Savings &amp; Trust operation in which many investors lost money. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Having spent lavishly during his illegal fund&rsquo;s existence, Mr. Shavers could not repay all the lost funds, though he tried &ndash; &nbsp;a fact the court took into decision when it came time to sentence the Texas man. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>In addition to the eighteen months, Mr. Shavers received penalties such as three years supervised release, a $100 special assessment, $1.2 million in forfeiture and $1.2 million restitution.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>IRS Sends Coinbase John Doe Summons<\/h2>\n<p><span>The IRS sent a John Doe Summons to Coinbase, one of the largest Bitcoin exchanges in the industry. The request asked for records from between 2013 through 2015.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Coinbase pledged to fight the request in court. Users of the service filed federal lawsuits in December, aiming to block what they see as the IRS&rsquo; overreaching claim.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The case, from the Northern California U.S. District Court, believes numerous persons using Coinbase might have &ldquo;failed to comply with provisions of the internal revenue laws.&rdquo; Coinbase&nbsp;is appealing.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Ripple approved for BitLicense in New York State<\/h2>\n<p><span>On June 13, the New York state financial regulation<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-usa-new-york-digital-idUSKCN0YZ25V\" target=\"_blank\"><span>approved<\/span><\/a> <span>Ripple Labs for the first-issued BitLicense. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The company cleared an anti-money laundering, capitalization, consumer protection and cyber-security review, &nbsp;according to the New York State Department of Financial Services. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&ldquo;DFS is pleased to continue to foster the growth of the New York virtual currency marketplace,&rdquo; Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria T. Vullo said in a statement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Ripple filed for the license under its corporate name XRP II LLC, which has received funding from Andreessen Horowitz, Google Ventures and IDG Capital Partners. <\/span><\/p>\n<h2>European-regulated Bitcoin product hits the market<\/h2>\n<p><span>The first European-regulated Bitcoin product hit the market over the summer. The Gibraltar Stock Exchange <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/gibraltar-first-european-bitcoin-eti\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span>launched <\/span><\/a><span>a Bitcoin product called BitcoinETI, an asset-backed exchange traded instrument.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>BitcoinETI is set to available on regulated brokerages across Europe and that regulation of Bitcoin and fintech in Europe is &ldquo;more agile&rdquo; than in the US. <\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Bitstamp Regulated in Europe<\/h2>\n<p><span>In Late April, major Bitcoin exchange<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bitstamp.net\/article\/bitstamp-first-nationally-licensed-btc-exchange\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span>Bitstamp<\/span><\/a> <span>made the announcement it had received a license to operate throughout Europe. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>T<\/span><span>he Luxembourg Ministry of Finance licensed BitStamp to operate as a payment institution with a license that applies to the European Union as a whole. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&ldquo;With this,&rdquo; says Dan Morehead, the chairman of Bitstamp and the CEO of Pantera Capital, a firm that specializes in investments related to bitcoin, &ldquo;Bitstamp is able to do business in all 28 countries of the EU.&rdquo;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>It took<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/2016\/04\/bitcoin-exchange-receives-approval-operate-across-eu\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span>Bitstamp<\/span><\/a> <span>about two years to procure the license. <\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Silk Road Oral Arguments<\/h2>\n<p><span>Silk Road oral arguments were heard in 2016, in which the defense posited that the conviction of Ross Ulbricht for operating the Silk Road was a result of a mistrial. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Citing corruption discovered in the case by lead investigators, the defense wants the conviction dropped citing a mal-investigation, but the judge on the case maintains the evidence proving Mr. Ulbricht&rsquo;s guilt as overwhelming. Still pending in the court of appeals, with more and more evidence pointing towards corruption of law enforcement officials, it&rsquo;s not sure whether Mr. Ulbricht will get a chance at a new trial.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Surely, more legal precedents were set in 2016, albeit in a quiet manner. Which did we miss? Please, let us know in the comments.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><em>Images courtesy of Shutterstock, and Pixabay.<\/em><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><i><span>How much do you want to know? Bitcoin.com has <\/span><\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/price.bitcoin.com\/?utm_source=newspage&amp;utm_medium=contentmarketing&amp;utm_term=pricepage&amp;utm_content=bitcoinprice&amp;utm_campaign=pricepagepromotion\" target=\"_blank\"><i><span>live data feeds<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span> with the latest world price indexes and trends (in three currencies) plus <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bitcoin.com\/widgets\" target=\"_blank\"><i><span>statistics<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span> on all the interesting facets of the bitcoin network.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/get-ready-for-2017-these-legal-precedents-on-bitcoin-were-set-in-2016\/\">Get Ready for 2017 &ndash; These Legal Precedents on Bitcoin Were Set in 2016<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/\">Bitcoin News<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><ins class=\"adbladeads\" data-cid=\"24663-3514371590\" data-host=\"web.adblade.com\" data-tag-type=\"4\" style=\"display:none\"><\/ins><br \/>\n<script async src=\"http:\/\/web.adblade.com\/js\/ads\/async\/show.js\" type=\"text\/javascript\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2016 saw numerous important court decisions made which affect the Bitcoin industry as a whole. We consulted lawyers and researched the biggest court cases of the year, ranging from whether or not Bitcoin is money to the fate of Ross Ulbricht. Here&rsquo;s what we&rsquo;ve found. Also read:&nbsp;China&rsquo;s Proposed New Law Recognizes Bitcoin as &lsquo;People&rsquo;s Rights&rsquo; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[309,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cryptocurrency","category-featured"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3880\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cryptocabaret.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}